Menu

SMD Component Counter

Most industries have holes that are generally too small to see. These holes can be thought of as ‘a lack something’, which can be a service, a functionality, a product etc. Finding these holes can be the starting point for most companies and start-ups, followed by the planning and development process to fill the hole.

This project was about one such hole.

In the electronics industry, a common method of packaging the small SMD (Surface Mount Device) components is via ‘Tape and Reeling’. The method involves the SMD components to be placed in pockets embossed in a plastic carrier tape, which is then wound around a disk-shaped reel.

Tape and Reeling


The counting of these components, when shipping them out to buyers, does not have a globally accepted, standard method. The research showed that different companies used different methods for the counting the components, ranging from simply measuring out the tape and taking an average, to the usage of bulky, expensive machines.

One particular company, where the majority of Warehouse workers applied the ‘tape measuring technique’, faced the problem of accuracy. They had received increasing number of complaints from the buyers that the delivered number of components were less than ordered.

The company decided to approach Leeds Beckett University to allow students to find a solution to the problem. Under the supervision of Dr. Mark Judge, the problem was assigned as a team project, with the team consisting of Lewis Riches, Hamza Khan and Adam Casey.

Products available in the market, providing the same functionality, were studied closely and the pros and cons of their usage were highlighted. It was noted that most available products that provided high accuracy were expensive, bulky and, in many cases, relatively less-simple to use.

Product Exemplars Overview


Different technologies (e.g., Rotary encoder, bar-code scanners, photo-interrupters etc.) were studied, that had the potential to be used in the product to be developed.

The development process was broken down into three parts: Counting mechanism, User Input and Case Design.

The Counting mechanism was created using a teethed wheel connected with a rotary encoder. An Arduino board was used as the brain behind counting, considering reverse rotation etc. For the User Input, push buttons were used in the prototype, with room for a keypad based alternative.

Counting Mechanism


The case designed proved to be relatively more challenging since the product demanded heavy focus on portability and ease-of-use.

Product Design Proposal (Usage)


At this point, the team needed to improve the existing protype and put together its components into a final product. This was also the point when an unseen intruder, known to many as COVID-19, announced its existence. The team members were divided and had to work remotely.

This resulted in two different case designs:

A 3D-printed product:

3D Printed product design


A CAD-based design:

3D Printed product design
Overall, the working prototype and the case design branching off from the original design, fulfilled its goals to a justifiable extent. The prototype had an almost hundred percent accuracy rate with a portable, easy-to-use design.

In conclusion, the product can be considered to be at a stage where, after heavy testing of the implemented prototype, the product can be taken to the manufacturing stage and introduced into the market.